Re: [PATCH] git: extend --no-lazy-fetch to work across subprocesses
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 20 quoted lines
>> So I do not have a strong opinion either way, if it is more
>> convenient to propagate the request out to other repositories when
>> we run processes in two or more repositories (e.g. "git clone
>> --local"), or if it is more convenient to make sure that the request
>> is limited to the target repository. Here is a version without the
>> local_repo_env[] change.
>
> Yeah, GIT_CEILING_DIRECTORIES is maybe a bad example. But I do think
> LITERAL_PATHSPECS is a better one, and the submodule-fetch example I
> gave would be genuinely surprising if it behaved differently than the
> superproject, I'd think.
>
> I do agree this is probably going to mostly be a debugging aid, so it
> might not matter much. But once in the wild these things tend to take on
> a life of their own. ;)
>
>> ----- >8 --------- >8 --------- >8 --------- >8 --------- >8 -----
>> Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] git: extend --no-lazy-fetch to work across subprocesses
>
> So anyway, this version seems good to me.