Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] t3701: don't hard code sha1 hash values
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 27, 2018, 22:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqinainjfy.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180227110404.16816-5-phillip.wood@talktalk.net>
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> t/t3701-add-interactive.sh | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh b/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh
> index bdd1f292a9..46d655038f 100755
> --- a/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh
> +++ b/t/t3701-add-interactive.sh
> @@ -10,6 +10,16 @@ then
> test_done
> fi
>
> +diff_cmp () {
> + for x
> + do
> + sed -e '/^index/s/[0-9a-f]*[1-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\.\./1234567../' \
> + -e '/^index/s/\.\.[0-9a-f]*[1-9a-f][0-9a-f]*/..9abcdef/' \
> + "$x" >"$x.filtered"Interesting ;-) You require .. and on the left hand side you want to see a run of hexdec with at least one non-zero hexdigit, which is filtered to fixed-length 1234567; right hand side is the same deal.
Which sounds like a reasonable way to future-proof the comparison.
If 7 zeros are expected in the result, and the actual output had 8 zeros, the filter does not touch either so they compare differently, which is somewhat unfortunate. Perhaps something like
/^index/s/^00*\.\./0000000../ /^index/s/\([^0-9a-f]\)00*\.\./\10000000../ /^index/s/\.\.00*$/..0000000/ /^index/s/\.\.00*\([^0-9a-f]\)/..0000000\1/
after the above two patterns help?