Re: [PATCH] doc: make HTML manual reproducible
Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> brian m. carlson wrote:
> ...
>> I don't think that's necessarily the case. I just tested using a random
>> name with another DocBook project I have and it seems to work fine, so
>> there shouldn't be a problem with specifying a name undefined in the
>> stylesheet using xsltproc.
>
> Oh, that's very good to know. Thanks for testing the fine
> details. I checked that works on a CentOS 6 system where
> the docbook-xsl version is 1.75.2, to test whether an older
> docbook-xsl is similarly forgiving of unknown --param's.
That is very good, indeed.