Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] cat-file: extract printing batch error message into function

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

This indeed seems to break t5313 when queued on top of 'master'; it tries to run "git cat-file --batch-all-objects --batch-check" and hits the exact codepath where a missing object is sent to the error codepath without obj_name set to anything.

I guess we now have an existing test that you can mimic that exhibits "missing" error? I do not know offhand if this test already qualifies as the test coverage Phillip wanted to make sure exists.

..... >8 .......... >8 .......... >8 .......... >8 .......... >8 .....

expecting success of 5313.3 'pack/index object count mismatch': 
	do_pack $object &&
	munge $pack 8 "\377\0\0\0" &&
	clear_base &&

	# We enumerate the objects from the completely-fine
	# .idx, but notice later that the .pack is bogus
	# and fail to show any data.
	echo "$object missing" >expect &&
	git cat-file --batch-all-objects --batch-check >actual &&
	test_cmp expect actual &&

	# ...and here fail to load the object (without segfaulting),
	# but fallback to a good copy if available.
	test_must_fail git cat-file blob $object &&
	restore_base &&
	git cat-file blob $object >actual &&
	test_cmp file actual &&

	# ...and make sure that index-pack --verify, which has its
	# own reading routines, does not segfault.
	test_must_fail git index-pack --verify $pack

4+0 records in 4+0 records out 4 bytes copied, 0.000119221 s, 33.6 kB/s error: packfile .git/objects/pack/pack-67be769e2843d598c78218852612520795998892.pack claims to have 4278190080 objects while index indicates 1 objects error: packfile .git/objects/pack/pack-67be769e2843d598c78218852612520795998892.pack claims to have 4278190080 objects while index indicates 1 objects --- expect 2023-03-03 23:11:37.504011940 +0000 +++ actual 2023-03-03 23:11:37.508012250 +0000