git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: [PATCH] unpack-trees: do not fail reset because of unmerged skipped entry

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
Jun 15, 2018, 19:58 UTC
Message-ID
<xmqqh8m3zurz.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To
<20180615044251.10597-1-max@max630.net>
Max Kirillov <max@max630.net> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
> After modify/delete merge conflict happens in a file skipped by sparse
> checkout, "git reset --merge", which implements the "--abort" actions, and
> "git reset --hard" fail with message "Entry * not uptodate. Cannot update
> sparse checkout." The reason is that the entry is verified in
> apply_sparse_checkout() for being up-to-date even when it has a conflict.
> Checking conflicted entry for being up-to-date is not performed in other
> cases. One obvious reason to not check it is that it is already modified
> by inserting conflict marks.
>
> Fix by not checking conflicted entries before performing reset.
> Also, add test case which verifies the issue is fixed.

I do not know offhand if "reset --merge" should force succeeding in such a case, but I agree that it is criminal to stop "reset --hard" with "not uptodate", as the whole point of "hard reset" is to get rid of the 'not up-to-date' modification.

I guess not may people make serious use of sparsely checked-out working tree and that is why such a failure is reported this late after the feature was introduced?

> +test_expect_success 'reset --hard works after the conflict' '
> +	git reset --hard
> +'

Do we want to verify the state after the 'hard' reset succeeds as well? Things like

 - all paths in the HEAD and all paths in the index are identical;
 - paths that do exist in the working tree are all identical to HEAD
   version; and
 - paths that do not exist in the working tree are missing due to
   the sparse checkout setting (iow, it is a bug if a path that is
   outside the "sparse" setting is missing from the working tree).
Show 7 quoted lines
> +test_expect_success 'setup: conflict back' '
> +	! git merge theirs
> +'
> +
> +test_expect_success 'Merge abort works after the conflict' '
> +	git merge --abort
> +'
Likewise here.
Show 14 quoted lines
> +test_done
> diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
> index e73745051e..65ae0721a6 100644
> --- a/unpack-trees.c
> +++ b/unpack-trees.c
> @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ static int apply_sparse_checkout(struct index_state *istate,
>  		 * also stat info may have lost after merged_entry() so calling
>  		 * verify_uptodate() again may fail
>  		 */
> -		if (!(ce->ce_flags & CE_UPDATE) && verify_uptodate_sparse(ce, o))
> +		if (!(ce->ce_flags & CE_UPDATE) && !(ce->ce_flags & CE_CONFLICTED) && verify_uptodate_sparse(ce, o))
>  			return -1;
>  		ce->ce_flags |= CE_WT_REMOVE;
>  		ce->ce_flags &= ~CE_UPDATE;
Thanks.
Previous: Max KirillovNext: Max Kirillov
Message 2 of 9 in “unpack-trees: do not fail reset because of unmerged skipped entry”
  1. unpack-trees: do not fail reset because of unmerged skipped entryMax Kirillov, Jun 15, 2018
  2. Junio C HamanoJun 15, 2018
  3. Max KirillovJun 16, 2018
  4. Max KirillovJul 10, 2018
  5. Duy NguyenJun 16, 2018
  6. Max KirillovJul 10, 2018
  7. Duy NguyenJul 11, 2018
  8. Junio C HamanoJul 11, 2018
  9. unpack-trees: do not fail reset because of unmerged skipped entryMax Kirillov, Jul 10, 2018

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.