Re: Git in GSoC 2014
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 27, 2014, 20:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqfvn4xpnh.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <530F9F59.4030307@alum.mit.edu>
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
Show 26 quoted lines
> On 02/27/2014 08:19 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes: >> >>> Sounds good. I suggest we make your blob a paragraph before the list of >>> bullet points rather than part of the list. Please suggest some "TBD*" >>> then I'll add it to the text. Would we also fill in "X" with the name >>> of the actual student involved in the conversation that is pointed to? >> >> I was not thinking about using a student thread (I do not remember >> having a good on-list interaction with past GSoC students). >> >> How about using this one from our recent past: >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/239068 >> >> which has the following good points to be used as an example. It: >> >> - involved multiple cycles and multiple reviewers; >> >> - showed good response to the comments from the original author; >> and most importantly >> >> - had everything related to the topic in one single neat thread. >> > > Change pushed. Thanks Junio!
Thank you for starting this.
Another point to add to the above three-point list is that it had an example of the original author defending (some of) the design choices he made and reviewers who initially raised questions and/or issues agreeing with that choice after the thinking was clearly explained.