Re: [PATCH 1/3] patch-id: make it stable against hunk reordering
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 27, 2014, 18:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqfvm3ecxp.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140327175746.GA3853@redhat.com>
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> I started to remove that code, but then I recalled why I did it like > this. There is a good reason. Yes, you can't simply reorder hunks just > like this. But you can get the same effect by prefixing the header:
Yes, that is one of the things I personally have on the chopping block. Having to deal with more than occurrences of the same pathname in the input made things in builtin/apply.c unnecessarily complex and I do not see a real gain for being able to concatenate two patches and feed it into a single "git apply" invocation.