Re: What's cooking in git.git (Aug 2014, #04; Tue, 26)

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Aug 27, 2014, 15:31 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqfvgieyoo.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140827081323.GA26538@peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

Show 9 quoted lines

> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 03:09:34PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> [New Topics]
>
> There are a few misc topics of mine that I'd like to ping on:
>
>   - jk/contrib-subtree-make-all; you picked up the topic, but it's not
>     in pu or "what's cooking". Just forgotten, I think?

Correct, I think. Will requeue.

>   - jk/send-pack-many-refspecs; this is in pu, but I didn't see it in
>     "what's cooking". I'm concerned that the "ulimit" test gave you
>     trouble and you punted on it. :)

It was picked up after the day's edition of "What's cooking" was written, or something, I think.

Show 6 quoted lines

>   - "fast-export --anonymize"; I noticed you didn't pick this up at all.
>     I agree it has yet to prove its worth, but I wonder if it is worth
>     shipping it (possibly labeled as experimental and not to be depended
>     on) to get it in the hands of users. The intended use is getting bug
>     reports from users, who are not always savvy enough to pick up (and
>     possibly rebase) a patch from the list. I dunno.

I was waiting for the topic to calm down a bit, without knowing if there will or will not be a reroll with some low-hanging fruit enhancement based on the discussion, to avoid an "oops, need to replace the one I queued but haven't pushed out yet with the new reroll".

Thanks.