Re: [PATCH 00/43] refs lmdb backend
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 3, 2015, 23:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqfv2vgkve.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1441245313-11907-1-git-send-email-dturner@twopensource.com>
David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> writes:
Show 29 quoted lines
> I think I've broken about all of the standalone stuff out, so here's > the main enchilada. > > This series depends on at least the following topics in pu: > dt/refs-bisection > dt/refs-pseudo > dt/reflog-tests > kn/for-each-tag (patch 21 and corresponding bits of 42 depend on this; > we could skip them, but I wanted this to apply on top of pu) > > As before, I tested by hacking the test suite to run under the lmdb > backend and changing a few dozen tests. The remaiing failures are > documented in Documentation/technical/refs-be-lmdb.txt, except for one > in t1404 where this version gives a different error message (but still > an error). > > As Jeff King suggested last time I sent this around, I've made the > reflog format slightly more efficient. Now it stores shas in a binary > format, and only uses a header entry if there are no real entries. > > Also, now per-worktree refs live in the filesystem. > > I've also made a number of fixes to memory leaks, formatting, > factoring, etc. > > As Michael Haggerty suggested, I'm now using struct ref_transaction as > a base struct for the ref transaction structs. > > Looking forward to reviews.
[03/43] seems to be missing, but without the list of changes in the cover letter it is hard to tell what got dropped.