Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2016, #04; Wed, 23)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 24, 2016, 21:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqfuvf7dfd.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <171B6E119FCF4E5CBF2831F6A7A004EA@PhilipOakley>
"Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@iee.org> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> This was just clarifying that if a variant of the bundle format (# > V3?) was used, that it must, if the name was retained(*), still work > as a sneakernet transfer option. In that case the user would need to > be told, or be able to find out via (e.g.) the 'verify' sub-command, > where the other half of the split bundle (the pack) was located so > that both halves could be copied for sneakernet transfer.
I was sort-of expecting that users are intelligent enough to not even imagine to use split-bundle for sneakernetting, as it would be obvious that there is no upside for doing so.