A few comments and questions.
* GSSNEGOTIATE is a synonym for NEGOTIATE since cURL 7.38.0
(released in Sep 2014); currently the earliest version we claim
to support is 7.19.5 (released May 2009) without imap-send, and
we require 7.34.0 (released Dec 2013) with imap-send, so for now,
it is prudent that this patch uses GSSNEGOTIATE.
* Is it something that the client code of libcURL can rely on that
these CURLAUTH_FOO macros are bitmasks [*]? If so, wouldn't
if ((http_auth_methods & CURLAUTH_GSSNEGOTIATE))
be clear enough (and less risk of making typo)?
* When we see 401, the first thing we do in the new code is to see
if GSS is enabled in auth_methods, and if so we drop it from
auth_methods (to prevent us from trying it again) and say REAUTH.
- What assures us that the presense of GSS bit in auth_methods
mean we tried GSS to get this 401? Could it be that we tried
basic and seeing 401 from that, but we haven't tried GSS and we
could retry with GSS now? Is it commonly known that GSS is
always tried first before Basic/Digest when both are availble,
or something like that? - When auth_avail was given by the cURL library, we further limit
the auth_methods (after dropping GSS) and say REAUTH. This is
not a new to the updated code, but can it happen that the
resulting restricted auth_methods bitmap becomes empty (i.e.
REAUTH would be useless)?Thanks.
[References]
* https://github.com/curl/curl/blob/b8c003832d730bb2f4b9de4204675ca5d9f7a903/include/curl/curl.h#L787C4-L787C64