Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] branch: suggest <remote>/<branch> on upstream slip
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 28, 2026, 07:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqfr272lq7.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <9883c28482be4ad43f0f999c2e6be9f9dd9fb13b.1782583345.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
"Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
Show 49 quoted lines
> diff --git a/builtin/branch.c b/builtin/branch.c
> index 1572a4f9ef..dede60d27b 100644
> --- a/builtin/branch.c
> +++ b/builtin/branch.c
> @@ -706,6 +706,29 @@ static int edit_branch_description(const char *branch_name)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void die_if_upstream_looks_like_remote(const char *new_upstream, const char *branch_name)
> +{
> + struct strbuf remote_ref = STRBUF_INIT;
> + int code;
> +
> + if (strchr(new_upstream, '/') ||
> + !remote_is_configured(remote_get(new_upstream), 0))
> + return;
> +
> + strbuf_addf(&remote_ref, "refs/remotes/%s/%s", new_upstream, branch_name);
> + if (!refs_ref_exists(get_main_ref_store(the_repository), remote_ref.buf)) {
> + strbuf_release(&remote_ref);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + code = die_message(_("--set-upstream-to takes a single <remote>/<branch> argument"));
> + advise_if_enabled(ADVICE_SET_UPSTREAM_FAILURE,
> + _("Did you mean to use: git branch --set-upstream-to=%s/%s?"),
> + new_upstream, branch_name);
> + strbuf_release(&remote_ref);
> + exit(code);
> +}
> +
> int cmd_branch(int argc,
> const char **argv,
> const char *prefix,
> @@ -957,6 +980,15 @@ int cmd_branch(int argc,
> if (!refs_ref_exists(get_main_ref_store(the_repository), branch->refname)) {
> if (!argc || branch_checked_out(branch->refname))
> die(_("no commit on branch '%s' yet"), branch->name);
> + /*
> + * Check the advice up front to avoid the ref
> + * lookups when the hint is off. The helper still
> + * calls advise_if_enabled() so the hint carries the
> + * standard "disable this message" instructions.
> + */
> + if (argc == 1 &&
> + advice_enabled(ADVICE_SET_UPSTREAM_FAILURE))
> + die_if_upstream_looks_like_remote(new_upstream, argv[0]);
> die(_("branch '%s' does not exist"), branch->name);
> }Hmph, something like adding a single liner in the caller, like this. ...
code = die_message(_("--set-upstream-to takes a single <remote>/<branch> argument"));
+ /* use _if_enabled here to show the hint on how to disable */
advise_if_enabled(ADVICE_SET_UPSTREAM_FAILURE,
_("Did you mean to use: git branch --set-upstream-to=%s/%s?"),
new_upstream, branch_name);
strbuf_release(&remote_ref);
exit(code);... was what I meant, because the most puzzling piece is that the function calls _if_enabled form there, when the caller is presumably already checked _enabled() and leaves the reader wondering if there are other callers of this function that does not check before calling it.
But this is so tiny a thing that once the code is written, it is probably not worth the churn to redo it. Let's declare victory and mark the topic ready for 'next'?