Re: [PATCH 10/13] Remove unnecessary historical note from "Object storage format"
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 25, 2013, 03:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqeh9imotd.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1339924016.1091137.1377329596491.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail08.arcor-online.net>
Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de> > --- > Documentation/user-manual.txt | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/user-manual.txt b/Documentation/user-manual.txt > index f713f26..aa6bfab 100644 > --- a/Documentation/user-manual.txt > +++ b/Documentation/user-manual.txt > @@ -4132,8 +4132,6 @@ about the data in the object. It's worth noting that the SHA-1 hash > that is used to name the object is the hash of the original data > plus this header, so `sha1sum` 'file' does not match the object name > for 'file'. > -(Historical note: in the dawn of the age of Git the hash > -was the SHA-1 of the 'compressed' object.)
As we no longer are able to read such a historical object, I think it is OK to drop the historical note in this particular case.
Thanks.
> > As a result, the general consistency of an object can always be tested > independently of the contents or the type of the object: all objects can