Re: [PATCH] t6300: avoid creating refs/heads/HEAD
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 27, 2017, 21:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqefyjnwat.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqshmzuyam.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> ... I suspect that calling interpret_empty_at() from
> that function is fundamentally flawed. The "@" end user types never
> means refs/heads/HEAD, and HEAD@{either reflog or -1} would not mean
> anything that should be taken as a branch_name, either. The latter should read "HEAD@{either reflog or -1 or 'upstream'}"Or do we make HEAD@{upstream} to mean "deref HEAD to learn the current branch name and then take its upstream"? If so @@{upstream} might logically make sense, but I do not see why @{upstream} without HEAD or @ is not sufficient to begin with, so...