Re: [PATCH] pretty: allow to override the built-in formats
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 6, 2020, 21:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqeene36t7.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200905195218.GA892287@generichostname>
Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com> writes:
> Hmm, I'm not sure how I feel about being able to override formats other > than "reference".
Is the idea to introduce a parallel namespace to pretty.<name>? I am not sure why that is a good idea than, say a single variable that says "to me, pretty.<name> would override even the built-in names".
I am not sure how I feel about being able to override built-in formats in the first place, though.
After all, pretty.<name> were introduced so that user-defined ones can be invoked with an equal ease as the built-in ones, but overriding common understanding among the users of the tool is a different story.