Re: [PATCH] cache-tree.c: fix i-t-a check skipping directory updates sometimes
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 6, 2016, 17:43 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqd1mqu0g6.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160704174807.6578-1-pclouds@gmail.com>
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
Show 34 quoted lines
> Commit 3cf773e (cache-tree: fix writing cache-tree when CE_REMOVE is > present - 2012-12-16) skips i-t-a entries when building trees objects > from the index. Unfortunately it may skip too much. > > The code in question checks if an entry is an i-t-a one, then no tree > entry will be written. But it does not take into account that > directories can also be written with the same code. Suppose we have > this in the index. > > a-file > subdir/file1 > subdir/file2 > subdir/file3 > the-last-file > > We write an entry for a-file as normal and move on to subdir/file1, > where we realize the entry name for this level is simply just > "subdir", write down an entry for "subdir" then jump three items ahead > to the-last-file. > > That is what happens normally when the first file in subdir is not an > i-t-a entry. If subdir/file1 is an i-t-a, because of the broken > condition in this code, we still think "subdir" is an i-t-a file and > not writing "subdir" down and jump to the-last-file. The result tree > now only has two items: a-file and the-last-file. subdir should be > there too (even though it only records two sub-entries, file2 and > file3). > > If the i-t-a entry is subdir/file2 or subdir/file3, this is not a > problem because we jump over them anyway. Which may explain why the > bug is hidden for nearly four years. > > Fix it by making sure we only skip i-t-a entries when the entry in > question is actual an index entry, not a directory.
Aha. Good catch.
However, this makes me wonder if subdir has only files all of which are i-t-a. The resulting top-level tree object should not record subdir/ as an empty (sub)directory in that case. I do not see where you are ensuring it in the patch below, though.
Show 52 quoted lines
>
> Reported-by: Yuri Kanivetsky <yuri.kanivetsky@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
> ---
> cache-tree.c | 4 ++--
> t/t2203-add-intent.sh | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cache-tree.c b/cache-tree.c
> index ddf0cc9..c2676e8 100644
> --- a/cache-tree.c
> +++ b/cache-tree.c
> @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int update_one(struct cache_tree *it,
> i = 0;
> while (i < entries) {
> const struct cache_entry *ce = cache[i];
> - struct cache_tree_sub *sub;
> + struct cache_tree_sub *sub = NULL;
> const char *path, *slash;
> int pathlen, entlen;
> const unsigned char *sha1;
> @@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int update_one(struct cache_tree *it,
> * they are not part of generated trees. Invalidate up
> * to root to force cache-tree users to read elsewhere.
> */
> - if (ce_intent_to_add(ce)) {
> + if (!sub && ce_intent_to_add(ce)) {
> to_invalidate = 1;
> continue;
> }
> diff --git a/t/t2203-add-intent.sh b/t/t2203-add-intent.sh
> index 2a4a749..12d701c 100755
> --- a/t/t2203-add-intent.sh
> +++ b/t/t2203-add-intent.sh
> @@ -82,5 +82,18 @@ test_expect_success 'cache-tree invalidates i-t-a paths' '
> test_cmp expect actual
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'cache-tree does not ignore dir that has i-t-a entries' '
> + git init ita-in-dir &&
> + (
> + cd ita-in-dir &&
> + mkdir 2 &&
> + touch 1 2/1 2/2 3 &&
> + git add 1 2/2 3 &&
> + git add -N 2/1 &&
> + git commit -m comitted &&
> + git ls-tree -r HEAD | grep 2/2
> + )
> +'
> +
> test_done