Re: Feature request: --preserve-merges to add "exec git merge ..." instead of "pick ..."
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jan 8, 2019, 18:38 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqd0p7571y.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAH0Uv3F4q0oPG2O58eTV5n+5eZcxHK9acGMX+4F4LTm1JATfhg@mail.gmail.com>
Andreas Hennings <andreas@dqxtech.net> writes:
> I tried this option after upgrading my git. > Unfortunately, no matter which variation I use, it still attempts to > rebase most or all of the feature branches before merging them. > Possibly depending on their ancestry.
Yes, I know that. But what I am hoping is that it won't actually touch the commits on the side branches UNLESS you tell in the insn sequence to modify them with "edit", "reword", etc. and instead fast-forward them.
Of course, it will allow you to muck with these commits on the side branches, which is a potential source of mistakes.