Re: [PATCH] glossary: describe "worktree"

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Feb 10, 2022, 19:14 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqczjuttyw.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <CAFQ2z_Pvje9LM0iyiP87S-L754zepEE_9k=_4Oa0w1Lo_pb=TQ@mail.gmail.com>

Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com> writes:

Show 6 quoted lines

> on a tangent: I posted a patch to write MERGE_AUTOSTASH,
> rebase-merge/autostash, etc. as refs.
> Is that the right direction? They are read like refs, but they are
> together in a directory with other bits of stateful data (similar to
> what is appended to FETCH_HEAD). Perhaps I should rather change the
> read path, so they're always read as files rather than refs?

I think that would be a lot more preferrable. If a file is written to record pieces of info, among which an object name happens to be included, it does not have to be recorded as a ref. Especially if it is an ephemeral file like MERGE_AUTOSTASH and FETCH_HEAD.