Re: [PATCH 2/3] ci: avoid bare "gcc" for osx-gcc job
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 10, 2024, 20:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqcypt4clp.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAO_smVhE25ZQqc1f_fx9oPX-kH8SHxwEc=mqOAi-xQ91+pF1CA@mail.gmail.com>
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> writes:
Show 15 quoted lines
> On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 9:24 AM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote: >> >> On macOS, a bare "gcc" (without a version) will invoke a wrapper for >> clang, not actual gcc. Even when gcc is installed via homebrew, that >> only provides version-specific links in /usr/local/bin (like "gcc-13"), >> and never a version-agnostic "gcc" wrapper. >> >> As far as I can tell, this has been the case for a long time, and this >> osx-gcc job has largely been doing nothing. > > If it's been doing nothing (which I interpreted as "it's doing the > same thing as osx-clang"), and we've not noticed any issues with that, > do we need the job at all? Should we just rely on clang and not test > with gcc on macOS, since it's not a compiler that's provided by the > platform anymore?
A very tempting suggestion. I do not see any problems with the direction.
Thanks.