Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2025, #03; Fri, 11)

> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 03:58:33PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> * ps/object-file-cleanup (2025-04-11) 10 commits
>>  - object-store: merge "object-store-ll.h" and "object-store.h"
>>  - object-store: remove global array of cached objects
>>  - object: split out functions relating to object store subsystem
>>  - object-file: split out functions relating to index subsystem
>>  - object-file: split up concerns of `HASH_*` flags
>>  - object-file: split out functions relating to object store subsystem
>>  - object-file: move `xmmap()` into "wrapper.c"
>>  - object-file: move `git_open_cloexec()` to "compat/open.c"
>>  - object-file: move `safe_create_leading_directories()` into "dir.c"
>>  - Merge branch 'ps/object-wo-the-repository' into ps/object-file-cleanup
>>  (this branch uses ps/object-wo-the-repository.)
>> 
>>  Code clean-up.
>> 
>>  Will merge to 'next'.
>>  source: <20250411-pks-split-object-file-v2-0-2bea0c9033ae@pks.im>
>
> Let's wait a bit with this one. There's been a couple more review
> comments that I want to address before this is ready for next.

>> * rj/build-tweaks (2025-04-09) 13 commits
>>  - config.mak.uname: set CSPRNG_METHOD to getrandom on Linux
>>  - config.mak.uname: add arc4random to the cygwin build
>>  - config.mak.uname: add sysinfo() configuration for cygwin
>>  - builtin/gc.c: correct RAM calculation when using sysinfo
>>  - config.mak.uname: add clock_gettime() to the cygwin build
>>  - config.mak.uname: add HAVE_GETDELIM to the cygwin section
>>  - config.mak.uname: only set NO_REGEX on cygwin for v1.7
>>  - config.mak.uname: add a note about NO_STRLCPY for Linux
>>  - Makefile: remove NEEDS_LIBRT build variable
>>  - meson.build: set default help format to html on windows
>>  - meson.build: only set build variables for non-default values
>>  - Makefile: only set some BASIC_CFLAGS when RUNTIME_PREFIX is set
>>  - meson.build: remove -DCURL_DISABLE_TYPECHECK
>> 
>>  Various build tweaks, including CSPRNG selection on some platforms.
>> 
>>  Comments?
>>  source: <cover.1743859985.git.ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
>
> I just reviewed this series. It looks mostly fine to me, but I do have
> one question regarding one of the Meson patches.