Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] fix interactive rebase short SHA-1 collision bug
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 26, 2013, 07:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqbo4kkjgl.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1377303042-50868-1-git-send-email-sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
> ... when 'next' is ready to be rewound after 1.8.4 > is released, a replacement to the original series should be sent with > all the incremental patches squashed in.
It was more like "could, if you want to help us keep clean history going forward", rather than "should" ;-) Thanks for resending.
I've locally queued this series after seeing the end-result matches what has been cooking.
Traditionally we waited for a few days after a release to see if we do not receive regression reports that require us to issue brown paper bag fixes before rewinding "next" and opening a new cycle. I am hoping that it will happen in a few days.
My responses may be slower than usual today (i.e. Monday 26th), as I would need to be sitting in dentist's for a few hours.