Re: [PATCH] parser: Unmangle From: headers that have been mangled for DMARC purposes
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 11, 2019, 04:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqblunj461.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20191010225405.GA19475@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> This might provide an alternate solution (or vice versa). I kind of like > this one better in that it doesn't require the sender to do anything > differently (but it may be less robust, as it assumes the receiver > reliably de-mangling).
I share the assessment. I also feel that relying on Reply-To: would make the result a lot less reliable (I do not have much problem with the use of X-Original-Sender, though).