Re: [RFC] introducing git replay
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 15, 2022, 20:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqbkx2ccj4.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOc6etYvOhqQn3icWj3Ny1m+J_60h7aiqW-gvm=dQyDLgG=6NA@mail.gmail.com>
Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantoranz@gmail.com> writes:
> But I am probably wrong in terms of what I understand that you meant. > Can you expand a little bit, if you don't mind?
What I had in mind is what I have to do every day multiple times. 'master'..'seen' is a series of merges of tips of different topic branches.
---T topic
\
\ \ \ \
--M---o----o----o----S seen
^
masterSome of the topic branches may get updated and 'master' may gain more commits by merging some topics. Now it is time to update the 'master'..'seen' chain.
---T---P topic (updated)
\
\ \ \ \
--M---o----o----o----S seen
\
o
\
N
masterIt would be wonderful if a single command like replay can be used to say "In the old history master..seen I have bunch of merges. master used to be M but now it is at N. Rebuild M..S on top of N _but_ with a bit of twist. Some of the topics in M...S may have been merged to 'master' between M..N and the replayed history on top of N does not want to have a merge from such 'already graduated' topics. Many topics are updated, either by adding a new commit on top or completely rewritten, and we want an updated tip of these topic branches, not the old tip that I merged when I created M..S chain, when replaying the history on top of N."
That kind of operation is quite different from what "rebase" does, and deserves to be under a different name.
Compared to that, "replay exactly the same set of commits in the same shape on top of a different commit whose tree happens to be the same as the original", is a mere special case of "rebase" that is not all that interesting. It may be a worthwhile thing to do to teach "rebase" capable of doing so reliably and more efficiently, but that still falls into "improving rebase" category, not meriting a separate command.