Re: [PATCH 1/2] builtin/sparse-checkout: remove NEED_WORK_TREE flag
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> I'm of the opinion that having sparse-checkout-related functionality
> all fall under the 'sparse-checkout' command makes sense. In the
> past, all such subcommands happened to require a working tree, but
> William has come up with a reasonable one that doesn't. So, I'd be in
> favor of this mixing.
Yup, I am OK with that reasoning myself.
> I'll try to get a chance to review these patches soon, perhaps this weekend.