Re: Git Scaling: What factors most affect Git performance for a large repo?
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 20, 2015, 21:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqa908z44h.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACBZZX45eCo6YS4EpHvMQjN32+-w5BztfoLiwh_rJTs7FydgoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:
Show 8 quoted lines
> I actually ran this a few times while testing it, so this is a before > and after on a hot cache of linux.git with 406 tags v.s. ~140k. I ran > the gc + repack + bitmaps for both repos noted in an earlier reply of > mine, and took the fastest run out of 3: > > $ time (git log master -100 >/dev/null) > Before: real 0m0.021s > After: real 0m2.929s
Do you force --decorate with some config? Or do you see similar performance difference with "git rev-parse master", too?
> $ time (git status >/dev/null) > # Around 150ms, no noticeable difference
This is understandable, as it will not look at any ref other than HEAD.