Re: [PATCH] pretty: add format specifiers: %gr, %gt, %gI, gi
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 11, 2016, 19:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqa8ho9eny.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20160711164317.GB3890@thunk.org>
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
>> I'm on the fence, so I'll let you decide how you want to proceed. I can >> live with "%gr" and "%gt", as they are at least symmetric with their >> author/committer counterparts. > > I'm on the fence myself. I can live with either, since either way the > long message command line will be going in .gitconfig. I have a > slight preference for %gr and %gt, as %gT isn't orthogonal with > %ad/%cd, but I could be easily pursuaded otherwise. > > Does anyone else have a strong opinion?
I am fine with %gr/%gt, with the understanding that the step beyond that would not be to add %gT but to do %(reflog:...), and giving similar longform to other things like %ad so that we can move things in the "maybe cumbersome to type but more readable" direction.