Re: [PATCH 1/2] t-prio-queue: shorten array index message

> If we get an unexpected result, the prio-queue unit test reports it like
> this:
>
>  # check "result[j++] == show(get)" failed at t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c:43
>  #    left: 5
>  #   right: 1
>  # failed at result[] index 0
>
> That last line repeats "failed" and "result" from the first line.
> Shorten it to resemble a similar one in t-ctype and also remove the
> incrementation from the first line to avoid possible distractions from
> the message of which comparison went wrong where:
>
>  # check "result[j] == show(get)" failed at t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c:43
>  #    left: 5
>  #   right: 1
>  #       j: 0

> Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
> ---
>  t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c b/t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c
> index d78b002f9e..616d0fc86f 100644
> --- a/t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c
> +++ b/t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c
> @@ -31,16 +31,18 @@ static void test_prio_queue(int *input, int *result, size_t input_size)
>  			get = prio_queue_get(&pq);
>  			if (!check(peek == get))
>  				return;
> -			if(!check_int(result[j++], ==, show(get)))
> -				test_msg("failed at result[] index %d", j-1);
> +			if (!check_int(result[j], ==, show(get)))
> +				test_msg("      j: %d", j);
> +			j++;
>  			break;
>  		case DUMP:
>  			while ((peek = prio_queue_peek(&pq))) {
>  				get = prio_queue_get(&pq);
>  				if (!check(peek == get))
>  					return;
> -				if(!check_int(result[j++], ==, show(get)))
> -					test_msg("failed at result[] index %d", j-1);
> +				if (!check_int(result[j], ==, show(get)))
> +					test_msg("      j: %d", j);
> +				j++;
>  			}
>  			break;
>  		case STACK:
> --
> 2.44.0