Re: [PATCH v2] builtin/gc: protect against sysctl() failure in total_ram
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 2, 2025, 20:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqa55mcnr8.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <4vz7mwsyckx4ie74qdlitcmhg4vyuoiuwzufd4nktgzu5ppzfx@cqmznirthjcp>
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com> writes:
> yes it does, but the "implicit" sign conversion will trigger a warning
Ahh, OK. That makes sense. Compilers tend to go quiet when we tell them we do mean what we are doing. Thanks.