Re: My patches

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Oct 17, 2013, 19:54 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqq8uxrzn9h.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <525c64ebe2390_197a905e84c@nysa.notmuch>

Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:

Show 10 quoted lines

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Such a review comment and the discussion that follows it after a
>> patch is posted is an essential part of the collaborative
>> development process in this community and it has helped the quality
>> of our end product. We unfortunately saw time and again that the
>> process rarely works when the discussion involves your patches.
>
> No, you did not. What you saw was a person that unlike a trained dog, argued
> against you. And apparently your definition of a good discussion is one in
> which the other person just does what you say, and doesn't argue back.

That is so untrue that it is not even funny. If the ultimate goal of your whining is to spread misinformation to make you look like a victim, you are not worth talking to.

Contributors often make sensible counter-arguments and/or explain the rationale better than they did in their original messages, and then receive a "Thanks for a dose of sanity" (or an equivalent phrased in different ways).