Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] pathspec labels [WAS: submodule groups]
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 16, 2016, 22:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq8tz91x1b.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kbJxf6qnj1vqkbFzXBU+6Cfh6RMvs2NqqeASZAPLFXu8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> Hmph, why not? > > We need a namespace for which > * we can guarantee that it is for labeling purposes only (even in the future) > * is obvious to the user to be a labeling name space > > Starting with "label" offers both?
Ah, of course. I thought that you were trying to limit ":(attr:<attribute>)" magic only to attributes that begin with "label-", which is where my "why not?" comes from.