Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] grep: fix grepping for "intent to add" files
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jun 22, 2016, 19:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq8txxm3ss.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8Acb+Hx1R66hcHQ7gNQ6TmKoUzC7Ar2PpSPkQeKM1EY8w@mail.gmail.com>
Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
>>> If cached is false and ce_ita() is true and either CE_VALID or >>> CE_SKIP_WORKTREE is set, we would continue to grep an _empty_ SHA-1. >>> But I think we should grep_file() instead, at least for CE_VALID. >> >> Yes, that is the breakage I noticed in the patch under discussion >> and that I wanted to fix in the "I wonder if a better change would >> be..." version. > > Heh.. I did guess that. Since neither solution is complete, I'm in > favor of Charles's and assume that i-t-a forces to ignore CE_SKIP and > CE_SKIP_WORKTREE. I could wait for people to come back complaining, > then we know there are real users in very obscure cases and will fix > it then.
I said something that can be misunderstood. I meant "I wonder if ..." version is correct. Charles's has the bugs you mentioned and I wanted to fix them by sending the "I wonder if..." version out.
But you seem to have misread my statement as "A bug is in my version and I want to fix that bug in my version". That is not what I meant.