Re: [PATCH] log: if --decorate is not given, default to --decorate=auto
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 23, 2017, 18:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq8tnveuqv.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMMLpeRtzYM3a639DcNbhqAmz3dNkRebvQps-gusEKx+eQqPgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes, that makes sense. I assume that when you talk about 'next', you > mean 'master'?
No, I do mean 'next'. See "A note from the maintainer" post that are sent to the list every once in a while (i.e. after a new release is tagged) for the project structure.
https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqy3vztypi.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com/
> If we want to use `git -p log` in a test, we'll have to change the > behavior of pager_in_use(). Alternatively, we could use > `GIT_PAGER_IN_USE=1 git log` instead.
Testing "git -p" is not the goal; testing that decorate defaults to auto during an interactive session is. We could run tests under pty like t7006 does using lib-terminal.sh if we really want to emulate an interactive session.
Exporting GIT_PAGER_IN_USE may be sufficient for the purpose of convincing the command to be in an interactive session for this test, even though it feels a bit too brittle to depend on the internal implementation detail.
Thanks.