Re: [PATCH 0/2] rebase --recreate-merges --keep-empty: don't prune empty
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 22, 2018, 16:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq8takm4y4.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1f7194bb-f48b-e229-94ae-44c58636172f@talktalk.net>
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@talktalk.net> writes:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On 20/03/18 19:32, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> With or without the above plan, what we saw from you were a bit >> messy to queue. The --keep-empty fix series is based on 'maint', >> while the --signoff series depends on changes that happened to >> sequencer between 'maint' and 'master', but yet depends on the >> former. > > Yes, that is awkward and unfortunate but the idea behind splitting them > into two separate series was to have a single set of bug fixes in the > history. The feature needed to be based on master, so if I'd had the bug > fixes in the same series you'd of had to cherry-pick them to maint which > would break branch/tag --contains. I'm not sure if that is a better option.
I said "a bit messy" but that was a statement of a fact, not a complaint. Sometimes, we cannot avoid that necessary solutions to real-life problems must be messy.
I still think what you sent was the best organization, given the constraints ;-).
Thanks.