Re: [PATCH] format-patch: teach --no-encode-headers
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 7, 2020, 22:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq8sj7rl85.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20200407203111.GA1936475@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> Saying "--no-rfc2047-encoding" would be more descriptive to _me_, but I > wonder if people not so familiar with the standards would find it a bit > obscure. Another option is to invert it to "--8bit-email-headers" or > something.
Yup, having "rfc2047" in the name of the option was one of the things I considered suggesting, but I didn't for the same reason. I am OK with "--[no-]8bit-email-headers" (when --8bit, rfc2047 is skipped). Or "--[no-]email-header-encoding".
Thanks.