Re: [PATCH/RFC] blame: CRLF in the working tree and LF in the repo
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2015, 19:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq7fswuj1s.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <553FD48B.1010608@kdbg.org>
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
> I set none of these. But I do commit CRLF and expect to get CRLF > back. Am I commiting binary files? Am I doing something that "Git does > not support"? Am I "on [my] own"?
I think these specific sentences are merely uninformed opinions; if I ignore and re-read what people said in the discussion, I think the thread as a whole makes sense.