Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] status: give more information during rebase -i
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 3, 2015, 17:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq7fqh5ecb.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <vpqh9pnm1hu.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> I would agree with "more strict" is it was about rejecting the input (to > catch errors), but here we're still accepting it without complaining
Yes, by "more strict", I meant that I would prefer to keep things we do not understand as intact as possible, while transforming what we do understand into whatever shape we deem appropriate.
> Actually, there's a hidden benefit in accepting not-well-formatted > input: it mimicks the shell equivalent closer, which means that we're > close to replacing the shell's collapse_todo_ids and expand_todo_ids in > C which would avoid C/shell duplication.
;-)
But as I said above, that is a mere "would prefer" preference, so I can go either way.