Re: git status always modifies index?
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> I am worried that the project is not learning from what happened here.
> ...
> Fair enough, though that feels like overengineering. But I *still*
> don't see what that has to do with the name "no-optional-locks". When
> is a lock *optional*? And how am I supposed to discover this option?
>
> This also came up during review, and I am worried that this review
> feedback is being ignored. In other words, I have no reason to
> believe it won't happen again.
I too would like to see this part explained a bit better.