Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] object_id part 11 (the_hash_algo)
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 6, 2018, 14:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq7erq892l.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20180206003359.GB7904@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
"brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 11:46:03AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Thanks for working on this. All changes looked sensible (even >> though I spotted one nit in the original, which was moved as-is, >> which does not count as a "change" ;-)). > > I forgot to ask: do you want a reroll which fixes this, or just a > follow-up patch on top to fix the comment?
I do not think it is in scope of the series, so a follow-up would be sufficient.
Thanks.