Re: Expected behaviour for pathspecs matching attributes in subdirectories
Matthew Hughes <mhughes@uw.co.uk> writes:
> Is this the expected behaviour? I looked in t/t6135-pathspec-with-attrs.sh and
> didn't see a test case covering something similar. If this is expected, is
> there another way to achieve what I'm looking for?
I wonder if this serves a good addition to the tests?
t/t6135-pathspec-with-attrs.sh | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git c/t/t6135-pathspec-with-attrs.sh w/t/t6135-pathspec-with-attrs.sh
index 457cc167c7..83e6bac8e5 100755
--- c/t/t6135-pathspec-with-attrs.sh
+++ w/t/t6135-pathspec-with-attrs.sh
@@ -75,6 +75,14 @@ test_expect_success 'check specific set attr' '
sub/fileSetLabel
EOF
git ls-files ":(attr:label)" >actual &&
+ test_cmp expect actual &&
+
+ git ls-files ":(attr:label)sub/" >actual &&
+ test_write_lines sub/fileSetLabel >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect actual &&
+
+ git ls-files ":(attr:label)sub" >actual &&
+ test_write_lines sub/fileSetLabel >expect &&
test_cmp expect actual
'