Re: [PATCH v2] worktree: detect from secondary worktree if main worktree is bare

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Jan 29, 2025, 17:08 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqq7c6dk0ol.fsf@gitster.g>
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cSdbjzTmsBOmFnMxzYLGrUzY46=mkW9S+si2KxLhS623Q@mail.gmail.com>

Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:

Show 11 quoted lines

>> Wow, your explanation is so much better than mine.Thank you for
>> “translating" it for the world :) I’m still trying to get used to
>> the terminology used in this codebase.  I’ll steal your description
>> for sure (if you don’t mind).
>
> You are more than welcome to use the proposed commit message rewrite.
>
> (If you want to acknowledge assistance rendered, a Helped-by: trailer,
> preceding your Signed-off-by:, is the way to do so. Or not. It's up to
> you.)
> ...

> Agreed about the is-bare checks -- and indeed the entire Git startup
> sequence -- being difficult to digest, however...
> ...

Thanks for an easy-to-read review (and thanks OP for working on it, of course).