Show 31 quoted lines
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 12:24 AM Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 1:50 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> > K Jayatheerth <jayatheerthkulkarni2005@gmail.com> writes:
>> > > @@ -1404,11 +1405,20 @@ static int do_create_stash(const struct pathspec *ps, struct strbuf *stash_msg_b
>> > > + if (flags & REF_ISSYMREF) {
>> > > + const char *tmp = NULL;
>> > > + if (skip_prefix(branch_ref, "refs/heads/", &tmp))
>> > > + branch_name_buf = xstrdup(tmp);
>> > > + }
>> > > + if (branch_name_buf)
>> > > + branch_name = branch_name_buf;
>> > > + else
>> > > + branch_name = "(no branch)";
>> > > +
>> > > + head_short_sha1 = repo_find_unique_abbrev(the_repository,
>> > > + &head_commit->object.oid,
>> > > + DEFAULT_ABBREV);
>> > > strbuf_addf(&msg, "%s: %s ", branch_name, head_short_sha1);
>> > > pp_commit_easy(CMIT_FMT_ONELINE, head_commit, &msg);
>> >
>> > Funny indentation, and branch_name_buf needs to be free'ed after use
>> > but other than that, nice digging!
>>
>> This change should also be accompanied by a new test to verify the
>> fixed behavior, right?
>
> I will be writing a patch series after checking CI and include tests,
> the only reason I sent this patch was
> if the bug reporter needed an immediate fix.
> Will send a new patch with test case and improved indentation