Re: [PATCH v8 5/5] help: respect new common command grouping
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 19, 2015, 18:20 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq617o8m5o.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cS15yzwbcdb-yLH5QiMoxa0utmaJaDDz=W9WfWd+PL37A@mail.gmail.com>
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
Show 17 quoted lines
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes: >> >>> The awk script restricts itself to POSIX, and I did test it on Linux, >>> Mac OS X, and FreeBSD, so it seems pretty portable. >> >> I was worried more about some people only having gawk while others >> with mawk and yet others nawk, etc., without having one of them >> under the canonical name "awk". It's nothing what >> >> $ make AWK=mawk >> >> or its config.mak equivalent cannot fix, but still bothers me a bit. > > In that case, perhaps we should go with the Perl version, which, given > that more people (these days) are familiar with Perl than awk, is less > likely to be a maintenance burden.
As long as we all can agree that the long-term direction we want to go in is to remove dependency on awk, that's fine by me.
That means a small awk scriptlets in t/ and elsewhere need to be rethought, though.
Thanks.