Re: GPG Commit Signing Project
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 18, 2020, 20:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq5z9fy9t9.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <43C81FDC-611D-45A1-9525-24640FEB2E1A@rams.colostate.edu>
Jimit Bhalavat <jimit@rams.colostate.edu> writes:
> Hello Junio,
Sorry, I read the message twice but I am not sure what you expect out of me. We usually do not evaluate a proposal only from its "design document" in the sense that we won't say neither "such a proposal is great" or "we won't accept such a proposal" until we actually see patches. It is a good idea to have a written design as it may help reviewers when they review patch submission.
> 5. All of these changes will make sure that we maintain > backwards compatibility. We are aiming to deprecate things a > little but old options will not stop working. We will > preserve existing behavior.
That is always a requirement by our project so it goes without saying ;-) but it is good to see the promise written down.