Re: [RFC doc] Tracking git.git
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 13, 2021, 20:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq5yzmbdfl.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <20210513144930.GC11882@localhost>
dwh@linuxprogrammer.org writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On 13.05.2021 20:05, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >>But tracking seen is more like tracking linux-next. We do NOT use git >>pull because often doing so will try to merge origin (upstream) with >>our local version, which are divergent and most likely will end with >>conflict. Instead, we do git fetch first followed by resetting to >>upstream by git reset --hard origin/seen. >> >>Should the fact above be documented? And on what file the fact should >>be placed? In INSTALL? > > I vote yes. I was trying out tracking the different branches and got > bitten by this very situation (tons of conflicts) when pulling seen.
I vote checking for existing docs before doing this, though. I would be surprised if we do not say "do not build on (fork from) 'seen' (formerly known as 'pu')".