Re: [RFC/PATCH] config: honor file permission bits
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 26, 2026, 15:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq5wyov738.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <at8R_QThIEedVbO8@pks.im>
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2026 at 07:54:13AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes: >> >> > What I wonder is what makes our config file so special compared to >> > everything else that uses lockfiles. Or put differently: if we think >> > it's important to honor permissions bits (which I think is sensible), >> > shouldn't we do that in a central location like in "lockfile.c" so that >> > all users of this interface behave the same? >> >> The $HOME/.gitconfig file and its XDG counterparts are the only >> out-of-tree files that suffer from this issue, and being outside the >> repository is what makes them special. Theoretically, /etc/gitconfig >> on a multi-user system could have the same issue, but the containing >> directory would typically be read-only for regular users, which makes >> the issue irrelevant there. > > That explanation makes sense to me. Probably something to put into the > commit message :)
I ended up rewriting the whole thing from scratch to follow the recommended flow more closely, starting from an observation of an end-user perceived problem, analysis of the issue, and the solution. The above naturally became a sidenote for the solution description.
Thanks.