Re: [PATCH] Document `rebase.forkpoint` in rebase man page
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Sep 16, 2021, 22:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq4kakrvdc.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <20210916223528.2910292-2-wesley@schwengle.net>
wesley@schwengle.net writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> From: Wesley Schwengle <wesley@opperschaap.net> > > The option exists and the rebase behaviour tricked me into thinking > there was a bug with git. This will tell people how they can tweak the > default behavior.
So this still does not explain what rebase behaviour tricked you into thinking so. That leaves the readers of "git log" frustrated, much more than a log message based only on a simple statement of fact, e.g.
"git config --help" describes rebase.forkpoint as a way to give
the default value for --[no-]forkpoint option, but "git rebase
--help" does not mention it. Help people who visits the documentation of "rebase" to find the
variable.or something like that.
Show 11 quoted lines
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt > index 506345cb0e..8d2bee3365 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt > @@ -446,7 +446,8 @@ When --fork-point is active, 'fork_point' will be used instead of > ends up being empty, the <upstream> will be used as a fallback. > + > If <upstream> is given on the command line, then the default is > -`--no-fork-point`, otherwise the default is `--fork-point`. > +`--no-fork-point`, otherwise the default is `--fork-point`. You can override > +this default by setting the configuration option `rebase.forkpoint` to false.
It is not wrong per-se, but sounds overly verbose and seems to give only half an advice. You can also set it to 'true' to override the default --no-fork-point given when you give <upstream> on the command line, no? So perhaps only a single line addition (plus downcasing "If" to "if"), i.e.
+ If `rebase.forkpoint` is set, that gives the default. Otherwise,
if <upstream is given on the command line, the default is ...would be a better rewrite?
Thanks.