Re: RFD: should we do another 2.3-rc for t9001-noxmailer? I'd say not
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 2, 2015, 20:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq386ot4s1.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20150202203838.GA30001@peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> I thought at first that we also had a regression in pruning with > alternates, but it looks like that bug actually went into v2.2. I still > think we would want the fix fairly promptly, but it does not need to > happen before v2.3 is released.
Yes, this was regression in v2.2 we did not catch X-<. The fix looks so obvious that it appears nothing should break, but that tends to be the famous last words, so...