Re: [RFC/PATCH] point pull requesters to Git Git Gadget

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Mar 13, 2019, 22:17 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqq36nqe7w6.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190313193909.GB3400@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

Show 22 quoted lines

> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:49:22AM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>> 
>> > infrequent contributors. And there are a few reasons to prefer GGG:
>> >
>> >   1. submitGit seems to still have a few rough edges. E.g., it doesn't
>> >      munge timestamps to help threaded mail readers handled out-of-order
>> >      delivery.
>> 
>> Hmph, I had an impression that the recent "why aren't these sorted"
>> topics were via GGG, not submitGit, though.
>
> We did have one case a few months ago, but I think it was since fixed.
>
> Whereas it cannot be fixed for submitGit without major re-architecting,
> because the mails go out through Amazon SES, which writes its own
> timestamp.
>
> I could be wrong about GGG being fixed though. I haven't noticed the
> problem lately, but we definitely had a submitGit-related one a few
> weeks ago.

Yeah, I was confused; <xmqqtvgk4urv.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> was about submitGit, but somehow I thought the sender switched to, and the out-of-order thread was sent via, GGG. My mistake.