Re: Questions about --ext-diff
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Aug 24, 2026, 20:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq33w3qn9b.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <20260824182302.GA177524@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> For many cases, I think textconv is a better experience. It is less > flexible (you must be able to transform the binary into something > textual, which is then diffed). But because of that it fits more neatly > into existing commands. I may be biased as the author of textconv, > though. ;)
As the author of ext-diff, I very much agree. The daily maintenance of the drafts of "What's cooking" report is very much the only thing that I find a custom --ext-diff program very useful, but I suspect that even its use can probably be substituted with creative use of the textconv filter, diff hunk header patterns, and the -W option.