Re: [RFH] hackday and GSoC topic suggestions
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Feb 11, 2014, 18:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqq1tz9qxyl.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20140205225702.GA12589@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> - Branch rename breaks local downstream branches > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/241228
If you have a branch B that builds on A, if you are renaming A to C, you may want B to automatically set to build on C in some cases, and in other cases your renaming A is done explicitly in order to severe the tie between A and B and setting the latter to build on C can be a bad thing---after all, the user's intention may be to create a branch A starting at some commit immediately after this rename so that B will keep building on that updated A.
So I am not sure if this is a bug.
> - git stash doesn't use --index as default > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/235892
I tend to think "git stash" was designed to work this way from day one.
> - using git commit-tree with "-F -" adds trailing newlines > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/236583
According to the initial commit that introduced this option, it deliberately calls strbuf_complete_line() to make sure we do not leave an incomplete line at the end.
Many of the other items in your "bugs" section seem to be worth fixing.
Thanks.